Why a 2026 checklist looks different
Technical SEO in 2026 is no longer about beating Googlebot — it is about being readable by every crawler that matters, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and the next wave of AI agents. The fundamentals stay; the surface area expanded.
The senior checklist
Crawlability
robots.txtallow-lists AI bots explicitly (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended)- Sitemap is segmented and submitted in Search Console + Bing
- Crawl budget allocated to revenue-driving URLs first
- No accidental
noindex,nofollow, or canonical loops
Indexation
- Every important URL returns
200, is in the sitemap, and is in Google - Faceted navigation is parameterised, canonicalised, or blocked
- Duplicate content is consolidated with canonicals (not
noindex)
Core Web Vitals
- LCP under 2.5s on mobile (real user monitoring, not just lab tests)
- INP under 200ms — the new INP metric replaces FID
- CLS below 0.1, no layout shift from late-loading widgets
Structured data
- Schema.org
Organization+WebSitesite-wide Article/BlogPostingon postsFAQPageonly where the FAQ is actually visibleBreadcrumbListon every nested URL- Validate in Rich Results Test and Schema Validator
AI search readiness
- Author bylines, publish dates and last-modified dates rendered in HTML
- E-E-A-T signals: author bio, credentials, links to LinkedIn
llms.txtat the root with a summary + canonical URLs- Clean prose, short sentences, scannable headings — what AI engines quote
Bottom line
The 2026 technical baseline is broader, not deeper. The teams winning are the ones that ship clean HTML, real performance, and clear authority signals — and stop arguing about whether to allow GPTBot.
This is the EN stub of the blog post. The conserved post; future posts will be created in WordPress on Hostinger and pulled here at build time.